The Tragedy of Fred Merkle, Part Three: It’s Time to Right a Historic Wrong!



Baseball History Comes Alive Now Ranked #2 by Feedspot Among All Internet Baseball History Websites and Blogs!

Guest Submissions from Our Readers Always Welcome!

Click here for details

Scroll Down to Read Today’s Essay

Subscribe to Baseball History Comes Alive for automatic updates (sign-up block found in right side-bar)

As a Free Bonus for subscribing, you’ll get instant access to my two Special Reports: Memorable World Series Moments and Gary’s Handy Dandy World Series Reference Guide!

 Fred Merkle Photo Gallery
Click on any image below to see photos in full size and to start Photo Gallery:

The Tragedy of Fred Merkle, Part Three:

It’s Time to Right a Historic Wrong!




“I wish I’d never gotten that hit that set off the whole Merkle incident. I wish I’d struck out instead. It would have spared Fred a lot of unfair humiliation.” -Giant Al Bridwell, whose hit led to the Merkle incident.

In Part Two of my series on the tragedy of Fred Merkle, I left off with the “Warren Gill Game,” played on September 4, 1908. It was eerily similar to the “Merkle Game” just three weeks later. Gill’s failure to touch second base in that game set off a chain reaction with tragic consequences for a 19-year old rookie named Fred Merkle. I’ll pick up the story of details of the game that changed Fred Merkle’s life forever.

The Merkle Game 

On September 23, 1908, the Cubs and Giants were tied for first place and were prepared to square off at the Polo Grounds.  The Pirates were only a game and a half back.  On that morning, Fred Tenney, the Giants’ regular first baseman,

Fred Merkle during his rookie year, 1908

woke up with a case of “lumbago,” and manager John McGraw penciled in Fred Merkle, the youngest player in the National League, to replace him. Merkle had appeared in only 38 games and this was to be his first big-league start.

The great Christy Mathewson took the mound for the Giants against Jack Pfiester for the Cubs. The game had only two umpires: Bob Emslie on the bases and Hank O’Day behind the plate. It was scoreless through four innings until Joe Tinker hit an inside-the-park home run in the fifth. The Giants tied the game in the sixth on Mike Donlin’s single which scored Buck Herzog. The game remained tied 1–1 when the Giants came to bat in the bottom of the ninth.

After Cy Seymour grounded out, Art Devlin singled. Moose McCormick then grounded sharply to second, but Devlin’s hard slide prevented a double play and McCormick reached first safely. With two outs and McCormick on first, Fred Merkle singled down the right-field line with McCormick advancing to third. Next up was Al Bridwell who hit Pfiester’s first pitch for a sharp single to center. Umpire Emslie was knocked on his “keister” avoiding the ball as McCormack scored easily from third with the apparent winning run…

But wait!

As Giants’ fans poured out of the stands and mobbed the field, Merkle, advancing from first base, veered toward the clubhouse apparently without touching second. In 1908 it was customary not to appeal to an umpire for enforcement of the force-out rule on walk-off hits. Cubs’ second baseman Johnny Evers, the protagonist in the Gill game three weeks earlier, saw an opportunity to have the rule enforced. Here’s what happened next:

“Evers shouted to center fielder Solly Hofman, who, amid the chaos caused by thousands of celebrating Giants fans, retrieved the ball and threw it to Evers. According to one account, Joe McGinnity, who was coaching first

The always-alert Johnny Evers was the principal in both the Gill game and the Merkle game.

base that day, intercepted the ball and threw it away into the crowd of fans. Evers retrieved the ball—or found a different ball—and touched second base.

Umpires Emslie and O’Day hurriedly consulted and O’Day, who saw the play from home plate, ruled that Merkle had not touched second base, and on that basis, Emslie ruled him out on a force and O’Day ruled that the run did not score. The play was immediately controversial. Retelling the story in 1944, Evers insisted that after McGinnity had thrown the ball away, Cubs pitcher Rube Kroh (who was not in the game) retrieved it from a fan and threw it to shortstop Tinker, who threw it to Evers. Five years later, Merkle admitted that he had left the field without touching second, but only after umpire Emslie assured him that they had won the game.” (quote from Wikipedia)

Of course, if someone had warned Fred Merkle, already considered one of the Giants’ smartest players, that Rule 59 suddenly would apply and supersede tradition for the first time in baseball history, he certainly would have trotted a few more steps and touched the bag. No one told him, so he didn’t feel the necessity to do so. The rule had never been enforced. As author Mike Cameron makes clear in his book, “Public Bonehead, Private Hero”:

”Merkle’s failure to touch second base was considered customary at the time. When National League President Harry Pulliam changed the ruling following the eerily similar ‘Gill Game,’ a mere three weeks before, he failed to immediately disseminate his decision to the ballplayers. ‘Did you have to touch second base or didn’t you?’ At the time, it just wasn’t clear. This ambiguity set the stage for the tragic chain of events of which Fred Merkle was the ultimate victim. It was a result that could easily have been avoided; Pulliam’s inaction regarding the Gill play was the equivalent of lighting a fuse to a bomb. It’s dangerous to have rules on the books which are not enforced or to have one set of rules written down and another acted out.”

Or to change custom without telling everyone…

Legendary broadcaster Red Barber once came to Merkle’s defense:

“Johnny Evers talked a great and good umpire, Hank O’Day, into making

HOF Umpire Hank O’Day was behind the plate in both the Gill game and the Merkle game.

one of the worse decisions in the history of baseball. The intent in this rule [at the time] applied to infield grounders and such. It did not apply to cleanly hit drives to the outfield that make a force-out impossible unless the runner on first drops dead.”

No less of an authority than Hall-of-Fame umpire Bill Klem agreed, calling it “The rottenest decision in the history of baseball. The force rule was meant to apply to infield hits, not balls hit to the outfield.”

Enforcement of the rule had changed, but not everyone knew. As is well known, the game was ruled a tie. The Giants and Cubs finished the season tied for first, the Cubs won the make-up game and went on to win the 1908 World Series. And Fred Merkle lived the rest of his life with the ignominy of the “bonehead” epitaph attached to his name.

If you’re like me, you consider baseball pure fun…a sort of escapism from the trials and challenges of the “real world.”  We never want to see someone’s life ruined over something that happens on the field, be it Fred Merkle, Bill Buckner, or even Steve Bartman. In spite of this handicap, Fred Merkle went on to have a solid 16-year major league career in which he hit .273 in 1,637 games, amassing 1579 hits, 82 home runs, 720 RBI, and 271 stolen bases, including 14 steals of home. As Cameron describes him:

“He was a rare power-speed player who usually hit in the clean-up spot, led four teams to pennants and contributed to two other league championships. How many people in any walk of life could endure such a handicap and still achieve success? Yet Fred Merkle did just that. He retired after baseball to a life of quiet dignity as a devoted husband, father, and successful businessman. As long as we maintain our dignity, self-respect, and strength of character, we possess the innate ability to overcome many of life’s adversities. How many of us will ever be challenged the way Fred Merkle was? And yet, somehow, Merkle managed to overcome this injustice. That is the enduring legacy of Fred Merkle’s life.’”

Well said, Mike. Here’s hoping my small part in this saga somehow helps to right a gross injustice done to a good man’s reputation over 113 years ago. It’s time to right this historic wrong.

Gary Livacari

Photo Credits: All from public domain

Information: Excerpts edited from the Fred Merkle Wikipedia page; from “Public Bonehead, Private Hero,” by Mike Cameron; and “The Glory of Their Times,” by Lawrence Ritter.

12 thoughts on “The Tragedy of Fred Merkle, Part Three: It’s Time to Right a Historic Wrong!

  1. Gary,

    Mike Cameron summed it up philosophically and Bill Klem made the definitive statement about the terrible Merkle decision.

    Thanks, DD. Where else on the web can anyone find such comprehensive and unique baseball info?

      1. Unfortunately, we lost Mike a couple years ago. He was a great guy, a great friend, and an outstanding baseball researcher.

          1. Thanks Jerry, I think it affected him deeply, but he was able to go on with his life. Would be difficult for anyone to live with something like that.

  2. I wrote this three-part series with Steve Bartman and other baseball scapegoats in mind. As I mentioned in the essay, no one’s life should ever be affected negatively for what happens at a baseball game. It’s pure escapism. When it intrudes on real life, then something is drastically wrong. My heart goes out to Steve Bartman every time I think about it. That could have happened to anyone.. to you or me, to our friends, to our children. It’s an absolute travesty. An incredible injustice.

  3. Hello Gary, Bill,

    This old law-and-order guy believes that rules are meant to be observed and enforced rather than broken and discarded, but in this exceptional case “fair is fair,” and the O’Day call was the real bonehead play of the day.

    I couldn’t have said it better than U2. Fred Merkle’s life-long, serene and triumphant management of this travesty is the best possible testament to his courage, steadfastness and self-respect. Congratulations to him!

    Best regards,

    Michael

  4. And we’re so glad, Michael, that you’re managing so beautifully the curious affliction known as “Word Twisties.”

    Our beloved “Your Friendly Editor,” Captain Gary, is spending only a few minutes these days translating your text as it appears in the comment section.

    Germany Schaefer would be more than proud of you!

  5. En garde, Stuttgart!

    Your words of apparent encouragement are a bit too straightforward for my comfortable comprehension. As my first and last client once said, “The law is very clear to me. I’d like you to cloud things up a little.” A reliable formula for living — don’t you think?

    Regrettably, Gary “Billy Budd” Liva-Little, he of the omnipresent green visor and blue pencil, does not. Our editor-in-chief is now complaining that my “oozy words about him twist.” THAT I understand, and the second he took the trouble to explain to our faithful conscripts that “The Lovely & Talented” = Keedy’s wife, I knew we were in for an afternoon of chalk-boards and hand puppets.

    Say-what?

    Love You Both,

    /s/ Twist & Shout

  6. Oh no…forget what I said, Michael, you’ve completely succumbed!

    Your last hope is to join “Verbiage Anonymous,” Please consider.

    Best, Tillie Schaefer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.